Philippe Beaulieu-Brossard

This presentation explores the promises and limits of translating business inspired systemic design approaches for military purposes by examining United States Special Operations Command (hereafter SOCOM) experiences as a case study. From late 2007 onwards, SOCOM gradually adopted systemic design as the main approach for adapting military personnel for emerging conflicts. This presentation investigates four episodes: the development of Systemic Strategic Design (SDD) (2007-2011) — an holistic approach enabling foresight, the design curriculum at the Joint Special Operations University (JSOU) (2011-2016), SOFWerX (2016) – an off-headquarter interface facilitating innovation and accelerating adaptation – and SOCOM design thinking white paper (2016). SOCOM first hired Booz Allen Hamilton’s Center for the Application of Design (CAD) for adapting military design thinking at the strategic level in 2007. These early efforts built on literatures in strategic studies, postmodern philosophy, systemic and complexity theory. Yet, the more SOCOM moved from contractual to internal systemic design capabilities, the more defense scientists, instructors and planners moved to business inspired systemic design literature. This presentation examines the benefits as well as the costs involved in this transaction. The benefits, to name but just a few, are simplification, acceleration, and legitimization, especially in non-combat contexts. The costs, to name but just a few, are diminished accountability, a greater tolerance to risk in terms of casualties, and lightness in the application of violence. This research is based on 17 ethnographic interviews, participant observation and textual analysis.

Citation Data

Author(s): OCTOBER 2016
Title: US SOCOM Goes Google
Published in: Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design
Article No.:
Symposium Dates:
First published: 20 September 2016
Last update:
Publisher Identification:

Copyright Information

Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design (ISSN 2371-8404) are published annually by the Systemic Design Association, a non-profit scholarly association leading the research and practice of design for complex systems: 3803 Tønsberg, Norway (922 275 696).


Open Access article published under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or form according to the licence terms.

Suggested citation format (APA)

Author(s). (20##). Article title. Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design, RSD##. Article ##.

Publishing with RSD

Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design are published online and include the contributions for each format.

Papers and presentations are entered into a single-blind peer-review process, meaning reviewers see the authors’ names but not vice versa. Reviewers consider the quality of the proposed contribution and whether it addresses topics of interest or raises relevant issues in systemic design. The review process provides feedback and possible suggestions for modifications.

The Organising Committee reviews and assesses workshops and systems maps & exhibits with input from reviewers and the Programme Committee.

Editor: Cheryl May
Peter Jones
Ben Sweeting

The Scholars Spiral

In 2022, the Systemic Design Association adopted the scholars spiral—a cyclic non-hierarchical approach to advance scholarship—and in 2023, launched Contexts—The Systemic Design Journal. Together, the RSD symposia and Contexts support the vital emergence of supportive opportunities for scholars and practitioners to publish work in the interdisciplinary field of systemic design.

The Systemic Design Association's membership ethos is to co-create the socialization and support for all members to contribute their work, find feedback and collaboration where needed, and pursue their pathways toward research and practice outcomes that naturally build a vital design field for the future.


Verified by MonsterInsights