In systemic design, agreements over how to resolve wicked problems may be quickly outdated by changing circumstances and unforeseen consequences. One approach is thus to design systems that can adapt or be adapted to the circumstances they find themselves in. Adaptability may, however, act conservatively, making outdated resolutions more resilient and so harder to change. In order to explore adaptability further, this paper introduces a precedent from the discipline of architecture: Generator – an unbuilt proposal for a retreat centre designed by Cedric Price during the late 1970s. Strongly influenced by the work of cybernetician Gordon Pask via consultants Julia and John Frazer, not only could Generator be reconfigured by its human participants to support different activities, it also had the capacity to rearrange itself should it be left in the same configuration for too long. Interpreting the project in terms of the role of difference in Pask’s conversation theory, this paper explores Generator as a possible paradigm for systemic design in situations where a stable consensus for action is either unfeasible or undesirable.