Systemic Analysis of a Large-scale organization Failure in UK Healthcare

Format: Papers, RSD8, Topic: Health & Well-being

Gyuchan Thomas Jun & Aneurin Canham

Simple linear approach prevalent in the majority of healthcare incident analyses has been the target of criticism and is not felt to be effective in complex systems, such as healthcare. STAMP (System Theoretic Accident Modelling and Process) is felt to be a promising method for the improvement of healthcare incident analysis. This study, therefore, aims to explore the applicability of STAMP in healthcare through the case study of the STAMP application to the large-scale organisational failure at Mid-Staffordshire NHS Trust between 2005-2009.

The effectiveness of the STAMP applications was evaluated with feedback from healthcare stakeholders on the usability and utility of STAMP. Healthcare stakeholders were generally positive about the utility of STAMP in providing a system view and guiding consideration of interactions between system components. However, many felt it to be a complicated method that would require specialist expertise. From the findings of the research, recommendations are made to improve STAMP and to assist future applications of STAMP in healthcare.

Citation Data

Author(s): OCTOBER 2019
Title: Systemic Analysis of a Large-scale organization Failure in UK Healthcare
Published in: Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design
Article No.:
Symposium Dates:
First published: 4 October 2019
Last update:
Publisher Identification:

Copyright Information

Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design (ISSN 2371-8404) are published annually by the Systemic Design Association, a non-profit scholarly association leading the research and practice of design for complex systems: 3803 Tønsberg, Norway (922 275 696).


Open Access article published under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or form according to the licence terms.

Suggested citation format (APA)

Author(s). (20##). Article title. Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design, RSD##. Article ##.

Publishing with RSD

Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design are published online and include the contributions for each format.

Papers and presentations are entered into a single-blind peer-review process, meaning reviewers see the authors’ names but not vice versa. Reviewers consider the quality of the proposed contribution and whether it addresses topics of interest or raises relevant issues in systemic design. The review process provides feedback and possible suggestions for modifications.

The Organising Committee reviews and assesses workshops and systems maps & exhibits with input from reviewers and the Programme Committee.

Editor: Cheryl May
Peter Jones
Ben Sweeting

The Scholars Spiral

In 2022, the Systemic Design Association adopted the scholars spiral—a cyclic non-hierarchical approach to advance scholarship—and in 2023, launched Contexts—The Systemic Design Journal. Together, the RSD symposia and Contexts support the vital emergence of supportive opportunities for scholars and practitioners to publish work in the interdisciplinary field of systemic design.

The Systemic Design Association's membership ethos is to co-create the socialization and support for all members to contribute their work, find feedback and collaboration where needed, and pursue their pathways toward research and practice outcomes that naturally build a vital design field for the future.


Verified by MonsterInsights