Reconceiving the Hospital as a Business for Flourishing

Format: Papers, RSD6, Topic: Health & Well-being, Topic: Socioecological Design

Jyotish Sonowal and Peter Jones

The healthcare sector in the Western world is in the midst of a significant change. The majority of healthcare expenses are incurred through major tertiary care, performed in hospitals, which are generally structured and function in much the same way as 100 years ago. Care organizations are undertaking a gruelling process of having to maintain clinical continuity and yet advance as businesses in a world where funding policies, clinical and information technology, patient demographics and relationships between other healthcare systems are constantly changing (Cohen et al., 2004). Besides, governments throughout the developed world are under pressure from the goals of the (IHI) Triple Aim, to reduce healthcare costs, while improving the quality of care (Howie & Erickson, 2002; McCue, 1997; Segesten, Lundgren & Lindström, 1998) and satisfy the patient experience.

In such an environment, healthcare providers are finding it difficult to innovate business models or to understand the far-reaching social and environmental impacts of their services. Our OCADU research project investigated the adoption of designing business cases as systems for flourishing, to help clinicians and administrators in a hospital to reconceive and analyze their current clinical services, discover gaps and barriers to flourishing, and define recommendations. We take Ehrenfeld’s (2002) concept of flourishing as the aim of sustainability, nothing short of sustaining all life on earth forever. Keyes (1998, 2002) defined social flourishing as the sum of qualities that would ensure a healthy sense of well-being and social integration, which holds significance for healthcare activities. We employ a social ecosystem model to help identify functions and measures of flourishing across nested, multi final social systems. Using the Flourishing Business Canvas (Upward and Jones, 2016), this research project explores ways of impact definition and evaluation and also measures social and environmental benefits which will help decision-makers in a healthcare setting.

The study resolves a base of relevant literature in business models, business sustainability, lean process, and flourishing, in the healthcare context. A design action research methodology was employed, with expert and practitioner interviews and a business model design workshop. The participatory design workshop introduced the Flourishing Business canvas to clinical decision-makers (director and managers) in Toronto’s North York General Hospital in a generative session. The participants were engaged to collaborate and articulate their service lines as businesses, mapping their proposals using the FB canvas in the form of a model. Observations, verbal data, and canvas results were recorded. This and data from interviews with other clinical directors are tallied and analyzed to look for common challenges faced by the hospital and areas of opportunities. This analysis also leads to rich insights into the Flourishing Business modelling process, especially in a hospital setting.

The unique contribution is the design of a process and method for representing conditions and elements of flourishing within healthcare service lines: a business process that is currently desired but unavailable to organizations (Jones, 2016, personal conversation). The recommended process is an attempt at changing the mindset of planners in a hospital from traditional capital planning to systemic design-based planning and resource decision making. The culmination of the research insights led to service design proposals embodied in a blueprint for “soft services”, based on the 4C journey model (Jones, 2017) and adapted for this research.

Citation Data

Author(s): OCTOBER 2017
Title: Reconceiving the Hospital as a Business for Flourishing
Published in: Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design
Article No.:
Symposium Dates:
First published: 12 October 2017
Last update:
Publisher Identification:

Copyright Information

Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design (ISSN 2371-8404) are published annually by the Systemic Design Association, a non-profit scholarly association leading the research and practice of design for complex systems: 3803 Tønsberg, Norway (922 275 696).


Open Access article published under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or form according to the licence terms.

Suggested citation format (APA)

Author(s). (20##). Article title. Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design, RSD##. Article ##.

Publishing with RSD

Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design are published online and include the contributions for each format.

Papers and presentations are entered into a single-blind peer-review process, meaning reviewers see the authors’ names but not vice versa. Reviewers consider the quality of the proposed contribution and whether it addresses topics of interest or raises relevant issues in systemic design. The review process provides feedback and possible suggestions for modifications.

The Organising Committee reviews and assesses workshops and systems maps & exhibits with input from reviewers and the Programme Committee.

Editor: Cheryl May
Peter Jones
Ben Sweeting

The Scholars Spiral

In 2022, the Systemic Design Association adopted the scholars spiral—a cyclic non-hierarchical approach to advance scholarship—and in 2023, launched Contexts—The Systemic Design Journal. Together, the RSD symposia and Contexts support the vital emergence of supportive opportunities for scholars and practitioners to publish work in the interdisciplinary field of systemic design.

The Systemic Design Association's membership ethos is to co-create the socialization and support for all members to contribute their work, find feedback and collaboration where needed, and pursue their pathways toward research and practice outcomes that naturally build a vital design field for the future.


Verified by MonsterInsights