Prototyping as a Resource to Investigate Future States of the System

Format: Papers, RSD6, Topic: Methods & Methodology

Juan de la Rosa, Karolina Kohler, and Stan Ruecker

Universidad Nacional de Colombia, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignKaiser X Lab, Allianz DEUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Even though design as a human action could be defined as one of the oldest natural practices (Muratovski, 2015), we can argue that what really defines it is not the ability to transform the tangible reality but, as established by Simon (1996), our capacity to envision an improved version of our reality in the future and plan what would be necessary to achieve it. This notion of an achievable preferred future state of the system might be one of the main advances in design theory because it centres the notion of design around the idea of a not-yet-existing reality that is possible to be produced.

While still subsists a widely-disseminated idea that design disciplines should be defined and differentiated based on the technical means of production that they rely on to solve the problems they faced (graphic, industrial, fashion) (Buchanan, 2001), we could also recognize that in recent years, common design practices have also recognized the value of design as being ‘solution oriented’. We could argue that one of the main benefits of this proposition is that it focuses on the existence of a diffuse problematic node that is produced by tension or displacement between what exists and what we really need or want (Ryan, 2014) and the existence of a possible, but the not-yet-existing reality that resolves that problem (Bødker, 1998). Being able to recognize the importance of the design process has led to producing complex models, like the ones presented by the design thinking community, and advancing into more complex scenarios.

Nevertheless, despite the significant advances of design-oriented disciplines and the methods used in the design process, most design models still understand the actualization2 of tangible solutions into the real world to address current problems as their main goal. This shortened view of the role of design somehow disregards the main ideas presented by Simon (1969) and Banathy (1996), that those models should not be centred on the constructed reality but on the future transformations of the system that they could produce.

The main purpose of this paper is to support the previous ideas presented by de la Rosa (2016, 2017) regarding the understanding of the ways that design can create new knowledge and what would that type of knowledge be. This paper is intended as both a conceptual addition to complement the model presented before, introducing to the discussion system-related notions like resolution, scale, complexity and uncertainty, and the use of practical cases of design research as case studies to explain and support the ideas presented; all with the expectation that those could help determine the issues presented by current design models and the possibility to use some experimental techniques based on prototyping to reconcile the view of a preferred future in the design process. We seek to provide a more systemic view of the model and a better understanding of how the model can be used in real-case scenarios, from initial cases of innovation in the industry to ill-defined social problems that we haven’t been able to solve as a society.




Citation Data

Author(s): Juan de la Rosa, Karolina Kohler, and Stan Ruecker
Title: Prototyping as a Resource to Investigate Future States of the System
Published in: Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design
Article No.:
Symposium Dates:
First published: 12 October 2017
Last update:
Publisher Identification:

Copyright Information

Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design (ISSN 2371-8404) are published annually by the Systemic Design Association, a non-profit scholarly association leading the research and practice of design for complex systems: 3803 Tønsberg, Norway (922 275 696).


Open Access article published under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or form according to the licence terms.

Suggested citation format (APA)

Author(s). (20##). Article title. Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design, RSD##. Article ##.

Publishing with RSD

Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design are published online and include the contributions for each format.

Papers and presentations are entered into a single-blind peer-review process, meaning reviewers see the authors’ names but not vice versa. Reviewers consider the quality of the proposed contribution and whether it addresses topics of interest or raises relevant issues in systemic design. The review process provides feedback and possible suggestions for modifications.

The Organising Committee reviews and assesses workshops and systems maps & exhibits with input from reviewers and the Programme Committee.

Editor: Cheryl May
Peter Jones
Ben Sweeting

The Scholars Spiral

In 2022, the Systemic Design Association adopted the scholars spiral—a cyclic non-hierarchical approach to advance scholarship—and in 2023, launched Contexts—The Systemic Design Journal. Together, the RSD symposia and Contexts support the vital emergence of supportive opportunities for scholars and practitioners to publish work in the interdisciplinary field of systemic design.

The Systemic Design Association's membership ethos is to co-create the socialization and support for all members to contribute their work, find feedback and collaboration where needed, and pursue their pathways toward research and practice outcomes that naturally build a vital design field for the future.


Verified by MonsterInsights