Papers

Leveraging Critical Values Tensions in Systems Design

Format: Papers, RSD9, Topic: Methods & Methodology

Russell Gaskin

CoCreative USA

Abstract

In systems change and design work, certain values-based tensions invariably emerge in the work, commonly Early wins & Systemic change, Differentiation & Integration, Data-driven analysis & Intuitive thinking, Interests in the parts & Needs of the whole, and Understanding the larger system & Empathizing with the human experience.

Based on practice across 24 multistakeholder networks, we have found that when these tensions are not shared and managed by all stakeholders, they are “mismanaged,” which often leads to polarization and disenfranchisement of members. On the contrary, when these tensions are managed well and treated as integrated “whole values,” they support deeper trust, a greater sense of interdependency, and more profound innovation.

By working at the values level rather than with just the positions or interests of stakeholders, we are also able to create a much more creative and dynamic design space.

In this talk, we will explore these tensions through cases and examples, and experiment with several frameworks for working effectively with them, including Competing Values, Dilemma Theory, the Theory of Constraints Conflict Cloud, Causal Loop Diagramming, and Polarity Thinking.

We’ll also examine common patterns in how these tensions play out in groups and at different levels of systems, from intrapersonal to large systems.

Citation Data

Author(s): Author: Russell Gaskin
Year:
Title: Leveraging Critical Values Tensions in Systems Design
Published in: Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design
Volume:
Article No.:
URL: https://rsdsymposium.org/
Host:
Location:
Symposium Dates:
First published: 4 October 2020
Last update:
Publisher Identification:

Copyright Information

Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design (ISSN 2371-8404) are published annually by the Systemic Design Association, a non-profit scholarly association leading the research and practice of design for complex systems: 3803 Tønsberg, Norway (922 275 696).

Attribution

Open Access article published under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or form according to the licence terms.

Suggested citation format (APA)

Author(s). (20##). Article title. Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design, RSD##. Article ##. rsdsymposium.org/LINK

Publishing with RSD

Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design are published online and include the contributions for each format.

Papers and presentations are entered into a single-blind peer-review process, meaning reviewers see the authors’ names but not vice versa. Reviewers consider the quality of the proposed contribution and whether it addresses topics of interest or raises relevant issues in systemic design. The review process provides feedback and possible suggestions for modifications.

The Organising Committee reviews and assesses workshops and systems maps & exhibits with input from reviewers and the Programme Committee.

Editor: Cheryl May
Advisors:
Peter Jones
Ben Sweeting

The Scholars Spiral

In 2022, the Systemic Design Association adopted the scholars spiral—a cyclic non-hierarchical approach to advance scholarship—and in 2023, launched Contexts—The Systemic Design Journal. Together, the RSD symposia and Contexts support the vital emergence of supportive opportunities for scholars and practitioners to publish work in the interdisciplinary field of systemic design.

The Systemic Design Association's membership ethos is to co-create the socialization and support for all members to contribute their work, find feedback and collaboration where needed, and pursue their pathways toward research and practice outcomes that naturally build a vital design field for the future.

SDA MEMBERSHIP

Verified by MonsterInsights