Select Page

Papers

Birger Sevaldson and Andreas Wettre
Gigamapping is by many appreciated as a method to understand complexity, mixing systems thinking and design. Too often we as teachers see that gigamapping is only used in this first phase of understanding and that the method seems not to be utilized to its potential in the more creative process, and throughout implementation. We are also challenging the idea that you need to understand first – and then be creative about possible solutions.
Sevaldson argues that designing early is needed to ask “what if” questions (Sevaldson, 2022). This is important to explore the system and how it might react. We think of this as a way of learning more about the system through designing. Also we have developed a creative process framework (Birger Sevaldson, 2019) that is still in the making. However, we now suggest that designing creatively even at the very beginning of a Systems Oriented Design process has its benefit. This will be explored further during the early fall of this year and presented at RSD12.
After some successful experiments we have changed our way of teaching. We now get students to design early, very early, and then immediately use the Impact and Threshold Analyses (IMP analyses) (Sevaldson, 2016)on their intervention(s) and we have seen how this creates new insights to go back to the gigamap develop it further and even starting to do an embedded boundary discussion, develop their expert network and get a sensible direction of their project.

Very early, maybe only after 30 minutes of mapping, we ask our students to design an intervention. This is long before they feel they have mapped enough. We ask them for “Any intervention, just challenge yourself to come up with an intervention”. They spend 10-15 minutes to design it – as a very first idea of potential intervention, not developed not likely to be a very good intervention just a tool to get further, fast and to radically change the way of thinking. We decouple the orthodoxy of first knowing and then planning. This sounds radical even irresponsible. But we do this in the early sketch phase as a means to understand and explore and to introduce creativity as a central tool in understanding systems through systemic design.

With this rough intervention we introduce the IMP analyses and and let the students run through it, all based on assumptions, with (almost) no facts. They look at the intervention through the different elements in the IMP analyses. Usually this takes 30 minutes. The IMP analyses introduces organized criticality and reflection which makes them think twice and change their ideas.

During the IMP analyses we have observed creativity to flourish, directions being developed, and a lot of the unconscious unknowns are being conscious. This again creates energy back into the gigamap, with a more deliberate approach to the unknowns, a more energetic mapping and collaboration. Sometimes this even creates more potential interventions that might be developed.

This, we find, is a very useful way of moving back and forth in the double or triple diamond and enhance both the ability to be aware of emerging ideas. The boundary discussions going on as a natural consequence of this process is an important element of developing systems thinking.

We have tested this with master students knowledgeable of SOD and gigamapping. We will explore further and include the results in our presentation.

Birger Sevaldson, A. W. (2019). SOD Creative Process Framework. Retrieved from https://systemsorienteddesign.net/sod-creative-process/
Sevaldson, B. (2016). Impact and Threshold Analyses (IMP). Retrieved from https://systemsorienteddesign.net/evaluation-tools/
Sevaldson, B. (2022). Designing Complexity: The Methodology and Practice of Systems Oriented Design. Common Ground Research Networks.
Keywords: Systems Oriented Design
Creative Process
Systems Thinking through design

VIEWS

N/A

 

Citation Data

Author(s): Birger Sevaldson and Andreas Wettre
Year: 2023
Title: IMPACT on creativity
Published in: Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design
Volume: RSD12
Article No.: pre-release
URL: https://rsdsymposium.org/impact-method-systems-oriented-design
Host: Georgetown University
Location: Washington DC, USA
Symposium Dates: October 6–20, 2023
First published: 30 September 2023
Last update: no update
Publisher Identification: ISSN 2371-8404

Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design, RSD12

These posts are in production. Please excuse incomplete or unformatted posts. If you would like to receive a paper or have questions about the proceedings, please contact cheryl@systemic-design.org. You can also opt into the newsletter and stay up-to-date on RSD12 proceedings and other systemic design news.

Watch for updates

Verified by MonsterInsights