Engineering a Better World: Building a human-centered engineering program that is design-driven and focused on social impact

Format: Papers, RSD9, Topic: Policy & Governance

Sunand Bhattacharya

Boston College, USA

Based on the complex problems the planet now faces and a seismic shift that is taking place in undergraduate education, how can we meaningfully weave science, technology and the liberal arts to make the world a better place – Through Human-Centered Engineering

For a while, Boston College (BC), as a traditional liberal arts institution, has reflected on the question of whether engineering should be one of its offerings? If so, what type of engineering education is right for its future students and the prevailing society? Engineering education sectors across the globe have sluggishly responded to the same question with forays into design-driven pedagogies. However, these efforts remain scattered and frequently marginalised. Most of all, they respond weakly to human needs in a complex global society. This situation creates a historically unprecedented opportunity for BC to develop and introduce its human-centred engineering (one that considers the end-user, and strives to have a meaningful impact on those of most need in society, while also responding to the needs of industry) both now and in the future.

Given the uniqueness of this engineering-education endeavour at BC and its first-time introduction into a liberal arts environment, human-centred engineering requires forward-thinking, strategic planning, needs analysis, and a process validating its assumptions from internal and external stakeholders.

Anchored by a human-centred, inclusive approach and coupled with design and systems thinking methodologies, engineering study at BC will be bolstered by a global viewpoint, ethical underpinnings, and distinctive capstone projects that address real-world challenges. This systemic approach well aligns with the mission of the university of delivering a liberal arts education that strives to integrate intellectual rigour with character formation so that our students become people who are well-prepared for meaningful lives and vocations oriented in service of the common good. The common good can be understood as the conditions and institutions that need to exist in society to sustain human well-being; the conditions of social life that will allow all persons to live a life of freedom and wholeness and fullness of life.

The BC human-centred engineering program has been designed to produce graduates particularly well-positioned to tackle major challenges facing the planet that have scientific, technological, human, ethical and societal dimensions of complex problems. We aspire to achieve this goal by combining the liberal arts focus of BC’s core curriculum, foundations of engineering, design and systems thinking applications, implementation science, and service-focused capstone experiences. Through experiential pedagogies and application-based course offerings, students will have opportunities to work in collaborative teams and across emerging cross-disciplines related to areas, for example, environment, health, and energy. Given the complex nature of this academic program, our process for developing it from concept to design to implementation and ultimately to integration into the BC culture is happening in phases.

This session will illustrate those phases and the approach of how, beyond representation in the sciences, the human-centred engineering program is being pedagogically modelled to draw upon its professional schools and the liberal arts offerings on campus to offer a broad-based interdisciplinary program of engineering studies as needed for educating a global workforce of the future. This is aligned with BC’s Jesuit education mission of educating students to be “men and women for others,” and its role as a major research university founded in a curriculum rich in the humanities, social sciences, and arts.

Citation Data

Author(s): Author: Sunand Bhattacharya
Title: Engineering a Better World: Building a human-centered engineering program that is design-driven and focused on social impact
Published in: Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design
Article No.:
Symposium Dates:
First published: 4 October 2020
Last update:
Publisher Identification:

Copyright Information

Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design (ISSN 2371-8404) are published annually by the Systemic Design Association, a non-profit scholarly association leading the research and practice of design for complex systems: 3803 Tønsberg, Norway (922 275 696).


Open Access article published under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or form according to the licence terms.

Suggested citation format (APA)

Author(s). (20##). Article title. Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design, RSD##. Article ##.

Publishing with RSD

Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design are published online and include the contributions for each format.

Papers and presentations are entered into a single-blind peer-review process, meaning reviewers see the authors’ names but not vice versa. Reviewers consider the quality of the proposed contribution and whether it addresses topics of interest or raises relevant issues in systemic design. The review process provides feedback and possible suggestions for modifications.

The Organising Committee reviews and assesses workshops and systems maps & exhibits with input from reviewers and the Programme Committee.

Editor: Cheryl May
Peter Jones
Ben Sweeting

The Scholars Spiral

In 2022, the Systemic Design Association adopted the scholars spiral—a cyclic non-hierarchical approach to advance scholarship—and in 2023, launched Contexts—The Systemic Design Journal. Together, the RSD symposia and Contexts support the vital emergence of supportive opportunities for scholars and practitioners to publish work in the interdisciplinary field of systemic design.

The Systemic Design Association's membership ethos is to co-create the socialization and support for all members to contribute their work, find feedback and collaboration where needed, and pursue their pathways toward research and practice outcomes that naturally build a vital design field for the future.


Verified by MonsterInsights