Developing a Systemic Design Practice to Support an Australian Government Regulatory Agency

Format: Papers, RSD5, Topic: Policy & Governance

Bridget Malcolm & Mieke van der Bijl-Brouwer

Regulatory agencies are an important stakeholder in addressing complex societal problems and are beginning to recognise that these kinds of problems cannot be managed using traditional regulatory tools. In this paper we examine existing regulatory problem-solving theories and identify their limitations in addressing complex problems that are dynamic, unordered and exist within social systems. We build on these findings by describing the outcomes of a case study examining the problem-solving practice of an Australian Government regulatory agency. We propose numerous opportunities for the development of a systemic design practice within a regulatory context. The development of a systemic design practice would support regulators to navigate disjointed governance systems and establish a shared fra(Jonge, 2012)me of reference to problems, disrupt traditional thinking patterns, enable solutions to be co-designed and encourage practices to incorporate active reflection and iteration.




Citation Data

Author(s): OCTOBER 2016
Title: Developing a Systemic Design Practice to Support an Australian Government Regulatory Agency
Published in: Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design
Article No.:
Symposium Dates:
First published: 20 September 2016
Last update:
Publisher Identification:

Copyright Information

Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design (ISSN 2371-8404) are published annually by the Systemic Design Association, a non-profit scholarly association leading the research and practice of design for complex systems: 3803 Tønsberg, Norway (922 275 696).


Open Access article published under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or form according to the licence terms.

Suggested citation format (APA)

Author(s). (20##). Article title. Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design, RSD##. Article ##.

Publishing with RSD

Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design are published online and include the contributions for each format.

Papers and presentations are entered into a single-blind peer-review process, meaning reviewers see the authors’ names but not vice versa. Reviewers consider the quality of the proposed contribution and whether it addresses topics of interest or raises relevant issues in systemic design. The review process provides feedback and possible suggestions for modifications.

The Organising Committee reviews and assesses workshops and systems maps & exhibits with input from reviewers and the Programme Committee.

Editor: Cheryl May
Peter Jones
Ben Sweeting

The Scholars Spiral

In 2022, the Systemic Design Association adopted the scholars spiral—a cyclic non-hierarchical approach to advance scholarship—and in 2023, launched Contexts—The Systemic Design Journal. Together, the RSD symposia and Contexts support the vital emergence of supportive opportunities for scholars and practitioners to publish work in the interdisciplinary field of systemic design.

The Systemic Design Association's membership ethos is to co-create the socialization and support for all members to contribute their work, find feedback and collaboration where needed, and pursue their pathways toward research and practice outcomes that naturally build a vital design field for the future.


Verified by MonsterInsights