Design Science in Health Care: co-designing an optimized patient pathway at a gynecological clinic of a large hospital in Switzerland

Format: Papers, RSD3, Topic: Health & Well-being, Topic: Policy & Governance

Author: Hans Kaspar Hugentobler

Jones mentions that “Healthcare is a complex system that deals with at least two irreducible sources of complexity: The institutional (distributed provider systems and hospitals) and the personal (the biological and social setting of the human body). Furthermore these realms cannot be isolated, because the purpose of the institution is to serve individuals.” (Jones, 2013a, xviii) Hospitals operate as institutional actors under pressure to navigate changing health care contexts where patients become more knowledgeable and more demanding. The challenge for design thinking is to “transforming organizational practices by continually repositioning real human beings in the center of design and service management decisions.” (Jones, 2013a, xvii) Dubberly et. al. (2010) go even further, describing a shift where patients eventually become self-managing designers of their own well-being based on designed enabling infrastructures.

This design research project aims at demonstrating the value of the design approach vis-à-vis a care team at a gynecological clinic with regard to improving pregnant women´s experiences along the patient pathway. The scientific goal is to demonstrate how design research can yield evidence and derived design propositions to drive improvement and innovation efforts through a co-creation approach informed by an “understanding of an understanding” (Krippendorff, 2005) of women that told their stories of giving birth, generated by means of a grounded theory approach.

The research team facilitated a workshop with 8 clinic professionals (midwifes, nurses, breastfeeding counselor, department managers, clinic director), 3 patients and 1 external midwife. They crafted a model and issues-related design propositions – later to be tested in situ – of an optimized version of a patient process. The results are evaluated against the “design capability for health practice and care organizations” framework of Jones (2013b, 5) with a specific focus on design as caregiving and co-creating care (Rethinking Care), design for patient agency, patient-centered care service (Rethinking Patients), as well as innovating points of care and systemic design in healthcare innovation (Rethinking Care Systems). The results are triangulated with 2 Scandinavian, design-related projects that focus on patient pathways. The project contributes overall to an evidence creation capability of design research at the intersection of organizational and design science.

Citation Data

Author(s): OCTOBER 2014
Title: Design Science in Health Care: co-designing an optimized patient pathway at a gynecological clinic of a large hospital in Switzerland
Published in: Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design
Article No.:
Symposium Dates:
First published: 28 September 2014
Last update:
Publisher Identification:

Copyright Information

Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design (ISSN 2371-8404) are published annually by the Systemic Design Association, a non-profit scholarly association leading the research and practice of design for complex systems: 3803 Tønsberg, Norway (922 275 696).


Open Access article published under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or form according to the licence terms.

Suggested citation format (APA)

Author(s). (20##). Article title. Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design, RSD##. Article ##.

Publishing with RSD

Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design are published online and include the contributions for each format.

Papers and presentations are entered into a single-blind peer-review process, meaning reviewers see the authors’ names but not vice versa. Reviewers consider the quality of the proposed contribution and whether it addresses topics of interest or raises relevant issues in systemic design. The review process provides feedback and possible suggestions for modifications.

The Organising Committee reviews and assesses workshops and systems maps & exhibits with input from reviewers and the Programme Committee.

Editor: Cheryl May
Peter Jones
Ben Sweeting

The Scholars Spiral

In 2022, the Systemic Design Association adopted the scholars spiral—a cyclic non-hierarchical approach to advance scholarship—and in 2023, launched Contexts—The Systemic Design Journal. Together, the RSD symposia and Contexts support the vital emergence of supportive opportunities for scholars and practitioners to publish work in the interdisciplinary field of systemic design.

The Systemic Design Association's membership ethos is to co-create the socialization and support for all members to contribute their work, find feedback and collaboration where needed, and pursue their pathways toward research and practice outcomes that naturally build a vital design field for the future.


Verified by MonsterInsights